While this is not my first
workshop, it has been quite a long time since the last one I had been involved
with. So let me begin by saying that I thoroughly enjoyed partaking in it. It was a fun process and by following it, it
actually offered me ideas of what I might be able to do better.
I often find that when most people
think of a critique that associate it with the idea of ripping someone’s work
apart making fun of mistakes and generally writing a scathing review or there
is the lofty praise comparing a work to some other persons work that has won
the affections of the person doing the critique. If any of them had the chance to sit in on a
true workshop critique then I think that there would be a very different
opinion on the matter.
I believe that requiring a solution
to every point you made in the story was a great idea. I think is pretty easy for someone to say
that you can do something better, but justifying how it could be done better is
definitely a good point. It also allows
the writer to hear ideas that they may not have thought of. I personally have a problem with thinking it
out in my head and then realizing that because I said it in my head that I did
not say it in my own writing.
The atmosphere of the workshop was
relaxed, and that helps when you are on the receiving end of a critique. When you are not on the defensive you do tend
to be more open to advice, or at least that has been my experience.
I am kind of looking forward to my
peer review; I am interested to see what people thought of my work and what
they could suggest to offer my story a more character and depth.
No comments:
Post a Comment